I didn’t Google my current guy, but it wouldn’t have mattered because I didn’t find him when I tried it just now.

From watching the show I don’t really get the sense that Cameron is emotionally/romantically attached to Chase – yet we question her reluctance to take the relationship further.

Why is that? Even you say that the situation is a “stereotypical role reversal,” so by doubting it, aren’t we only enforcing these biased and unreasonable stereotypes?

It seems that the doubt comes from little more than an inability to see beyond the stereotype that women are overly-sensitive, emotional, or too invested.

I apologize if it seems as if I’m attacking you. I just wonder why it’s so difficult to accept that maybe a woman just wants to “hook-up.” We rarely ever question a male’s ability to follow his sex-drive without involving emotion, yet we can never ever accept this in a female. I’ve had a lot of discussion with my male friends on the subject, and they seem to think the differences lie in the possession of testosterone. They blame everything on it, and claim that because women don’t have it, we can’t possibly have sex just to have sex, because we don’t have this so-called “drive.”

I say, bullshit. There’s probably some truth to that, but I don’t think hormones control everything. I have a lot of girl friends who will hook-up with a guy, never wanting to see him again, only to have him call and pester her asking for a date or another chance to meet.

So is it really the hormones and differences in gender, or is it just that as women gain independence and power and no longer have to maintain traditional ideals of femininity we start to see that some women really just want to hook-up?

http://nymag.com/news/features/15589/